December 29, 2011
Roger Ebert revisits Robert Zemeckis' CONTACT; you should, too.

This kind of thing is why Ebert is still Ebert. Rattles off over 1,000 words on a 14-year-old movie and his prose and points make you not only contemplate the nature of the universe, but YOU WANT TO WATCH THE MOVIE AGAIN despite its debilitating McConaughey factor. That, my friends, is blogging magic and the man (Ebert, not McConaughey, obvs) has it shooting out of his pores.

Naturally, the comment string that ensues is pretty epic as well.

  1. trxfreely reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  2. najmetender reblogged this from stayforthecredits and added:
    Reblogging to read later I have so much respect for Ebert and I hope I can achieve that kind of credibility-swag in...
  3. stayforthecredits reblogged this from burbanked
  4. bobbymarc reblogged this from burbanked
  5. imwithkanye said: despite its debilitating McConaughey factor
  6. burbanked posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus